A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out concerning potential neighbours above the development of the wall at a coastal web-site within a north Dublin suburb, a case which includes captivated countrywide interest subsequent an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones home at Sutton Strand, where allegations of organizing breaches, environmental worries, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Periods posting about René Collier and the Irish Times article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a local disagreement has evolved right into a really publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above development operates at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a business director respectively, search for to construct their relatives household. The case is becoming emblematic of wider disputes alongside Eire’s coastline, where growth pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of set up residents. In accordance with the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting created by their prospective neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted below organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each citizens of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their scheduling authorization by building a wall over and above the boundaries in their site, resulting in an encroachment with a Particular Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such parts are topic to rigorous controls below European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have lasting ecological repercussions, particularly in the delicate coastal atmosphere for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their planning authorization, and say the wall, that's partly created, is in the proper placement. Their lawful team has characterised the action being an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The couple accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding as a way to preserve their view, an allegation that's been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal scheduling disputes, where views of the sea are both equally very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic endeavours by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the site, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by midsection-superior drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances, an image that has because come to be emblematic from the intensity from the dispute. These actions were not basically symbolic; they have been meant to gather visual proof in the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Instances noted, describing how the two men entered the drinking water during extreme weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm water to photograph the internet site turned Just about the most hanging descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely noted that this kind of steps were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall extended into an area afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was getting encroached on.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included intimately from the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 became greatly searched phrases as audience sought to comprehend the track record and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read additional submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders need to be granted to halt development pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential instant while in the legal timeline.
With the Main from the dispute is actually a disagreement more than boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep which the wall, as built, goes over and above what was authorized and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has been called meticulous in his assessment of scheduling documents, maps, and situations attached on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those pressured that their motion is enthusiastic by concern for environmental protection and adherence to setting up regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving A non-public check out, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have explained their prolonged-standing link to the area as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair only wanting to establish a household home in accordance Along with the law. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Distinctive Region of Conservation and say that each one is effective happen to be completed dependant on Expert suggestions and permitted designs. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea in the course of a storm, tend not to alter the underlying specifics.
The case has also raised broader questions about how preparing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute over construction of wall at coastal site is becoming a shorthand description for your predicament that numerous observers see as increasingly popular. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation amongst non-public land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats has become additional contentious.
The Irish Moments posting about René Collier noted which the businessman experienced Formerly been associated with local advocacy on preparing and environmental troubles, however not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from really various Expert backgrounds can find them selves aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, have grown to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning with the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-substantial h2o for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by waist-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the physical actuality on the coastline as well as symbolic nature from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme strategy.
As being the High Court proceedings continue on, the result stays uncertain. The court need to decide if the wall as developed complies with arranging permission and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Specific Spot of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and scheduling disorders. Still the human aspect remains central: neighbours who should live along with each other long once the legal costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design will work at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the case prolong over and above that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. It also underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary issues for example environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of all-natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre on the dispute stands partly built, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Whether or not it can finally be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as prepared will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Rene Collier Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin lately.